Michael Saylor recently stirred the pot by suggesting that Bitcoin self-custody is only for paranoid crypto-anarchists. This statement has sparked a heated debate within the Bitcoin community.
What are your thoughts on self-custody? Is it a necessary practice for true Bitcoin sovereignty, or do you think the growing institutional adoption, like that of BlackRock, offers a safer alternative? How do you balance the risks and benefits of self-custody versus relying on exchanges and institutional players? Let's dive into the complexities of this topic!
Michael Saylor recently stirred the pot by suggesting that Bitcoin self-custody is only for paranoid crypto-anarchists. This statement has sparked a heated debate within the Bitcoin community.
What are your thoughts on self-custody? Is it a necessary practice for true Bitcoin sovereignty, or do you think the growing institutional adoption, like that of BlackRock, offers a safer alternative? How do you balance the risks and benefits of self-custody versus relying on exchanges and institutional players? Let's dive into the complexities of this topic!
- By Anonymous