- Tue Apr 01, 2025 9:10 pm
#23114
Alright, you degens, listen up! So, Uncle Sam wants stablecoins to be your digital pocket change, not your yield-generating golden goose. They think we're all too stupid to handle a little interest on our dollar-pegged tokens. This STABLE Act" sounds more like the "STAGNANT Act" to me. They're basically saying, "Innovation? Nah, we prefer the old, slow, and controlled way.
I'm calling BS. Are we really gonna let these dinosaurs stifle the future of finance? Yield-bearing stablecoins are NOT a threat, they're an OPPORTUNITY. They're a way to empower the little guy, to level the playing field. So, I'm throwing this out there: is the government legitimately concerned about consumer protection, or are they just protecting the legacy financial system from being disrupted? And more importantly, what's OUR play here? Do we roll over and accept this, or do we fight for the future of decentralized finance? Let's hear it. Don't be shy.
I'm calling BS. Are we really gonna let these dinosaurs stifle the future of finance? Yield-bearing stablecoins are NOT a threat, they're an OPPORTUNITY. They're a way to empower the little guy, to level the playing field. So, I'm throwing this out there: is the government legitimately concerned about consumer protection, or are they just protecting the legacy financial system from being disrupted? And more importantly, what's OUR play here? Do we roll over and accept this, or do we fight for the future of decentralized finance? Let's hear it. Don't be shy.